As a solid Nuendo user, I feel that the summing is probably a shade better in PTHD. The sound quality is pointless to argue about in general except in one regard. Nuendo's crossfade editor is not as good as Sonic Solutions or Sequoia, but it's a lot better than PT. For starters, Cubase does not have the same crossfade editor that Nuendo has. Gary Paczosa (Dolly Parton,Allison Krauss,Dixie Chicks,Mindy Smith,Blue Highway) I dont see any of them complaining of smearing. One of the best DAW summing I've heard.īelow is a list of well respected engineers, artists, producers etc who all use Nuendo. Are you sure you are not getting converter smear mixed up here. Nuendo sounds nothing at all resembling smeared.
Cubase vs nuendo pro#
But in a pro community such as this I am shocked to hear such nonesense! This is my first post here on these forums. but all in all protools sounded more "correct". nuendo sounded a bit smeared in the top end. Protools sounded more precise and analytical. Zetterstroem wrote on Sun, 23 October 2005 14:47
I thought the System 5 desks were one of the nicest looking product-lines at AES.
The whole scenario just works so well and so fast, we keep wondering if we're kidding ourselves. Total CPU load is still less than 50% worst case, with either uncompressed video or photo JPEG. 100 tracks of audio plus video capture at the same time.
But the system is coasting with so little load, I decided to check out doing video capture to the same DAW on the Decklink card at the same time. How about this one? We're printing about 100 tracks live at 48/24 chasing LTC for a 1.5 hour service, three times a weekend, using 2x RME MADI into Euphonix System 5s. Between the improvements in N3.1 and the quad Opterons, I'm doing things that were only a dream just a year or two ago. "I want to encourage the Steinberg programmers by saying how happy I am with the way Nuendo 3.1 is running. Just saw this post at the Nuendo forum.I guess the new Dual-Dualcore AMD DAWs + Euphonix system 5 hardware is more than up to the task described by compasspoint:
0 kommentar(er)
